I’m sure Vox is no fan of this part of the platform, as it’s not the most libertarian of views:
Pornography, at best, is a distortion of the true nature of sex created by God for the procreative union between one man and one woman in the holy bonds of matrimony, and at worst, is a destructive element of society resulting in significant and real emotional, physical, spiritual and financial costs to individuals, families and communities. We call on our local, state and federal governments to uphold our cherished First Amendment right to free speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy.
With the advent of the Internet and the benevolent neglect of the previous administrations, the pornography industry enjoyed uninhibited growth and expansion until the point today that we live in a sex-saturated society where almost nothing remains untainted by its perversion. While we believe in the responsibility of the individual and corporate entities to regulate themselves, we also believe that our collective representative body we call government plays a vital role in establishing and maintaining the highest level of decency in our community standards.
The Constitution Party Platform can viewed in it’s entirety here.
It’s interesting that those who usually cry for separation of church and state are also opposed to any reduction in porn. This platform is right on — as long as each jurisdiction takes care of it’s own. For example, the feds should regulate and stop interstate traffic of porn, but should leave states to stop the production and manufacture of it. Unfortunately, with the internet, there is NO possible way to track and stop this sort of thing, and it is worthless to spend money trying to stop it. Can you say, “War on Drugs?”